In the fanless MacBook Air, the M2 did indeed provide some extra performance, but at the cost of added heat. The M2 didn’t play out quite in the same way, though. These are all benefits from having more efficient chips that create less hot air. It feels miraculous how quiet and cool the M1 Macs ran, despite having great performance and battery life. Heat and thermalsĮver since the beginning, efficiency has been an important selling point of Apple Silicon. The second problem, though, is one that’s much harder to avoid. The problem is, even if you’re choosing one of the base configurations, buyers of these MacBook Pros are far more likely to notice the difference in speed, or at least be frustrated that Apple wasn’t more forthcoming.įortunately, this is a problem that can seemingly be avoided by opting for one of the larger capacity SSDs. Remember: Apple doesn’t even sell a 256GB version of these MacBook Pros, so these are the cheapest models you can purchase. But according to some new reports, these 512GB configurations of the new MacBook Pros also have slower storage speeds, leading some to believe Apple has cut the same corner this time around. I certainly thought that with the M2 Pro and M2 Max MacBook Pros, this issue would be avoided entirely. The lack of transparency was frustrating, but considering the price of these laptops, it wasn’t a huge deal. In fact, in some real-life tests like large file transfers, these M2 MacBooks were slower than M1 MacBooks. Hoping for an OLED MacBook Pro? We’ve got some bad newsīy using just a single NAND chip on the 256GB models of the MacBook Air and 13-inch MacBook Pro, storage speeds were significantly slower than on the larger-capacity models. Own an iPhone, iPad, or MacBook? Install this critical update right now Your next MacBook Air could be even faster than expected
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |